Federal Habeas Corpus Cases
These petitions to SCOTUS should of been denied for not complying with Federal law to apply at the district court in which the prisoners were held. 28 USC 2242. The 2255.Motions to vacate were at the court of their conviction and sentencing. I will find out if the outcome is the same for 28 USC 2241 filings that I have started.
“The writ of habeas corpus is a high prerogative writ, known to the common law, the great object of which is the liberation of those who may be imprisoned without sufficient cause. Ex Parte Watkins, 28 U.S. 193, 202 (1830) Chief Justice Marshall.
APPLICATIONS/PETITIONS
The first few petitions listed for habeas corpus have reached SCOTUS. They have already been to the lower court they were convicted in. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/2242
The court should have ordered the response. The court rules are inconsistent with federal law 28 U.S.C. 2243. vioilating (the word court refers to the district court)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/2243
The following SCOTUS cases a have link to the case.
In the appendix are the District Courts document.
Reverse numerical order is the latest decision.
HABEAS CORPUS MARIJUANA
CASES TO SCOTUS
All denied. Treated as writs of certiorari.
7. SCOTUS 23-6541
In re Ronald Freeman
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23-6541.html
U.S. District Court
District of Western Tennessee
U.S.A. v. Ronald Freeman
2021/10/15
Case 2:21-cv-02656-SHL-atc
SHERYL H. LIPMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT
JUDGE
1 2255 Motion to Vacate 10/15/21
4 Order 5/12/22 marijuana not a liberty interest. Denied COA
5. Judgment May 26, 2022
6. SCOTUS 22-7593
In re Edwin W. Rubis
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Click: Case Documents go to Docket Search, enter
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-7593.html
This case was timed barred ro file in the District Court he was convicted.
5.
SCOTUS 22-6144
In re Richard Daniels
Denied
www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-6144.html
U.S. District Court
District of Maine
U.S.A. v. Richard Daniels
2:18-cr-63-GZS-001
1033 Criminal Judgement
Daniels v
U.S.A.
2:21-cv-312-GZS
Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison
Judge George Z. Singal
1071 2255 Motion 11/01/21
1077 Government Response 01/31/21
1083 Reply 01/25/21
1105 Magistrate judge Recommendation 04/08/22
Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison
file:///C:/Users/mjdee/Documents/2022%20SCOTUS/1st%20Danials%20Decided/1105%20daniels%20magistrate%20judge.pdf
1113 Opposition
1115 Denial of COA 05/19/22 Judge George Z. Singal
1071 2255 Motion 11/01/21
1077 Government Response 01/31/21
4. SCOTUS 21-7973
In re Roberto Villarreal
www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docket/docketfiles/html/public\21-7973.html
When I prepare a writ I have 5 numbered full pages. Getting other documents notarized the I notice something odd about the 5th page. There was extra pace. But it did not click.
Once the writ was docketed in SCOTUS, I saw the errors. No constitutional provisions and the date was incorrect. I do remember that twice a pop up appeared asking if I wanted to continue to share documents. I said no. WTF
But the most important part is the questioned presented
District of Southern Texas
2021-08-23
USA v Villarreal
5:21−cv−00096
030 Criminal Judgment 8/24/20
Villarreal v USA
5:21-cv-96
Marina Garcia Marmolejo
United States District Judge
001 Motion to Vacate 8/23/2021
002 Mem. of in support
005 ORDER 03/23/2022
006 FINAL JUDGEMENT 03/23/2022
3. SCOTUS 21-5821
In Re Pineda
www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docket/docketfiles/html/public\21-5821.html
Denied 11/01/2021
SCOTUS 21-7410
In re Pineda
www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/21-7410.html
Appendix was filed but not on the docket. ???
(b) U.S. District Court,
District of Eastern Texas
2020-10-19
Pineda v U.S.A.
6:19cr39
325 Pineda’s 2255 motion to vacate Filed 10/19/2020
Pinada v USA
6:20 cv 559
Jeremy D. Kernodle
U.S. District Judge
001 2255 motion to vacate filed 10/19/20
005 Report and Reccomendation of Magistrate Judge 06/10/21
006 Pineda objection
007 Judges opinion and order.
008 Judgment Denied Certificate of Appealability. No constitutional right is denied by incarceration.
Appendix not posted.? Posted in 21-5821
2. SCOTUS 21-334
In Re Wafer
Filing of Extra ordinary Writ of Habeas corpus 06/09/2021, conference 9/27/21 denied 10/4/21
www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docket/docketfiles/html/public\21-334.html
SCOTUS 21-715
In Re Wafer
www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docket/docketfiles/html/public\21-715.html
Denied Rehearing
(b) U.S. District Court, District of Oregon
U.S.A. v. Wafer
2020/12/15
Judge Robert E. Jones
17 cr 435
258 Habeas corpus § 2255 filed 12/15/2020
264 Government
response filed 02/04/21
Marijuana not a fundamental right
266 Wafer’s reply 03/08/21
267 Court order. Filed 03/26/21
269 COA Denied. 03/29/21
1. RAY
SCOTUS 21-54
In Re Ray
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docket/docketfiles/html/public\21-54.html
Docket Number 21-54
Denied 21/10/4
(b) U.S. District Court,
District of Northern Texas
2020/4/20
U.S.A. v. Ray
19-cr-00010-O(5)
20-CV-049-O
Judge Reed O’Connor
267 Ray’s § 2255 motion filed 4/20/20.
7:20-cv- 49-O
005 Order to Amend 12/21/20
006 Amended Motion 2255 01/04/21
007 Order COA Denied 04/16/21
008 Final judgement. 04/16/21
OTHER 2255 Motions to Vacate
U.S. District Courts
All district court document can be access on PACER
https://pacer.login.uscourts.gov/csologin/login.jsf
U.S. District Court Cases Closed
8.
U.S. District Court
District of Maryland
21/10/10
U.S.A. v.
Wheeler
Criminal Case No. CCB-19-455
70 Criminal Judgment
Wheeler v U.S.A.
Civil No. CCB-21-cv-2691
Catherine C. Blake
United States District Judge
Signed off not to seek habeas relief, plea agreement.
72 2255 Motion 10/10/2021
73 Order to respond. 12/3/21
79 Government response 2/18/22
80 Wheeler’s reply. 3/1//22
7. U.S. District Court
District of Southern Mississippi
2022/03/24
U.S.A. v Jones
1:21-cr-67 LG-RPM-001
Criminal Judgment 10/7/21
Jones v
U.S.A.
1:22 CV 65-LG
LOUIS GUIROLA, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10 2255 Motion to Vacate 3/24/
11 Mem. of Law
12 Court order 4/21/22
13 COA Denied 4/21/22
14 Reconsideration 5/5/22
15 Denied 5/9/22
6.
U.S. District Court
District of Western Louisiana
2020/05/11
U.S.A. v. Robinson
3;18-cr-228-1
Judge Terry A. Doughty
Mag. Judge Karen L. Hayes
34 Criminal Judgment
40 Robinson’s § 2255 Motion 5/11/2020
43 Court Order 5/13/ 2020
44 Court judgment 5/13/2021
45 Court Denies COA Denies Standing. Liberty not a right
5.
U.S. District Court
District of Southern Mississippi
2020/02/28
U.S.A. v. Davison
3:17-CR-149-DPJ-FKB
Davison v USA
3:20 cv 116
Daniel P. Jordan III
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
In Behalf § 2255. (e)
195 § 2255 motion in behalf. 2/28/2022
196 § 2255 Court order
3/3/2020
206 In behalf opposition to order 3//3/2020
207 Court order denial opposition to 196 3/3/2020
Davison’s Filing
201 Davison § 2255 motion
202 § 2255 Court
order.3/18/2020
204 Court Denies
COA 3/10/2020
4.
U.S. District Court
District of Western Michigan
10/22/2020
U.S.A. v. Corbin closed
1:18-cr-166
Corbin v USA
20-cv-1010
Paul L. Maloney United States District Judge
316 2255 Motion to vacate Filed 10/22/2020
317 Memorandum of law
318 Order to Answer 10/23/2020 60 days to Respond
324 USA Motion to Dismiss 12/16/2020
330 Corbin’s Response 1/8/2021
334 Order Time Barred
3.
U.S. District Court
District of Virgin Island
U.S.A. v. Bully Closed
1:17-cr-00012-1
George W. Cannon, Jr. Magistrate Judge
147 2255 Motion to Vacate, Habeas Relief
164 OPPOSITION Dated: June 21, 2019
Gretchen C. F. Shappert United States Attorney,
/s/ Daniel H. Huston Assistant U.S. Attorney
168 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 07/22/2019
George W. Cannon, Jr. Magistrate Judge
171 Opposition to R. & R.
192 Bully’s 2255 motion ignored
2. U.S. District
Court
District of Maine
2019/06/03
U.S.A. v Sawtelle
1:17-cr-00125-JDL-2
John C. Nivison, U.S. Magistrate
Judge
Chief Judge JON D.
LEVY
142
Sawtelle’s § 2255 motion filed 6/3/19
143 Order to respond 6/4/2019 60 days
144 USA Response p. 5-7. 7/29/2019
145 Reply 8/12/2019
147
Recommendation p. 6-7 12/17/2019 John C. Nivison, U.S. Magistrate Judge
148 Objection 12/30/2019
149 Order COA denied. 2/6/2020 Chief Judge JON D. LEVY
1.
U.S. District Court
District of Wyoming
2019-05-14
U.S.A. v. Doty Closed
I:18-CR-0102-SWS
18cr102
Judge Scott W. Skavdahl
44 Doty § 2255 motion I filed in behalf § 2255(e) 5/14/2019
45 Doty 2255 order Dismissed Marijuana not a fundamental right. 5/16/2019
Title 28. Judiciary and judicial Procedures
Part VI. Chapter 153. Habeas Corpus
Section 2255 Motions Federal custody; remedies on
motion attacking sentence
RULES AND STATUTES GOVERNING 2255 MOTIONS TO VACATE
CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY (COA) is STANDING
See 28 U.S. Code § 2253 (c)(1)(B)(2)A certificate of appealability may issue under paragraph (1) only if
the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
Public Access Court Electronic Record
PACER.gov
https://www.pacer.gov/reg_pacer.html
Register, PACER case search, Maine District Court, District of Maine Doc Filing System
Query: upper left, Enter case number 17cr125, Check Sawtelle; Lower left click run query, History/Documents Run query, Doc #s 142-149
(Best to type case numbers similarto this 17 cr125)
PACER up tp 300 pages viewed or down loaded per quarter is free.
OR email to mjdeeour4th@outlook.com to have documents sent to you.
2255 Motions to Vacate Convictions Cases
In dismissing these 2255 motions to vacate, the government lawyers and judges failed to respond to the allegation of ground one which are the same in all § 2255 motion applications. Rule (5)(b).
Ground One:
[Inmate]is being illegally deprived of a substantial constitutional right, his liberty. Congress criminalized marijuana without compelling government reasons therefore without due process of law contravening the 4th and 5th Amendments of the Constitution of the United States and is unconstitutional.”
The courts have denied the being incarcerated is seizure of person and deprivation of their constitutional right of liberty.
Print 