Open
U.S. District Court
District of Maine
U.S.A. v. Richard Daniels
2:18-cr-63-GZS-001
1033 Criminal Judgement
Daniels v U.S.A.
2:21-cv-312-GZS
Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison
Judge George Z. Singal
1071 2255 Motion 11/01/21
1077 Government Response 01/31/21
1083 Reply 01/25/21
1105 Magistrate judge Recommendation 04/08/22
Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison
file:///C:/Users/mjdee/Documents/2022%20SCOTUS/1st%20Danials%20Decided/1105%20daniels%20magistrate%20judge.pdf
1113 Opposition
1115 Denial of COA 05/19/22 Judge George Z. Singal
SCOTOS 22-6641
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-6144.html
U.S. District Court
District of Maryland
21/10/10
U.S.A. v. Wheeler
Criminal Case No. CCB-19-455
70 Criminal Judgment
Wheeler v U.S.A.
Civil No. CCB-21-cv-2691
Catherine C. Blake
United States District Judge
72 2255 Motion 10/10/2021
73 Order to respond. 12/3/21
79 Government response 2/18/22
80 Wheeler’s reply. 3/1//22
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
“The writ of habeas corpus is a high prerogative writ, known to the common law, the great object of which is the liberation of those who may be imprisoned without sufficient cause. Ex Parte Watkins, 28 U.S. 193, 202 (1830) Chief Justice Marshall.
(Redundant)
United States District Court
Post-conviction relief.
Title 28 U.S. Code Chapter 153 Habeas Corpus § 2255 Motions to Vacate Convictions
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/2255
U.S. District Courts in dismissing § 2255 motions to vacate, the government lawyers and judges failed to respond to the allegation of Ground One which are the same in all the applications. Section 12
RULES GOVERNING SECTION 2255 PROCEEDINGS FOR THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Rule 5 (b) Contents. The answer must address the allegations in the motion. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/rules-governing-section-2254-and-section-2255-proceedings.pdf pages 14, 19
The U, S. District Courts have denied Certificate of Appealability (COA) There is no substantial denial of any constitutional right being in federal custody. 28 USC § 2253
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/2253
This denies being incarcerated is seizure of person and deprivation of prisoners' constitutional right of liberty. They are political prisoners.
Amendment V. No person shall be deprived of life, liberty and property without due process of law.
SCOTUS
Original Jurisdiction
Habeas Corpus
"Writs of habeas corpus may be granted by the Supreme Court, any justice thereof,the district courts and any circuit judge within their respective jurisdictions. " 28 U.S.C. 2241 (a)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/2241
“If addressed to the Supreme Court, a justice thereof or a circuit judge it shall state the reasons for not making application to the district court of the district in which the applicant is held.” 28 U.S.C. 2242 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/2242
“A court, justice or judge entertaining an application for a writ of habeas corpus shall forthwith award the writ or issue an order directing the respondent to show cause why the writ should not be granted, unless it appears from the application that the applicant or person detained is not entitled thereto.” 28 U.S.C. 2243
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/2243
SCOTUS RULES 20.4. (a) (b).
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/supct/rule_20
Such rules are inconsistent with federal law violating 28 U.S.C. § 2071. Such rules “shall not abridge, enlarge or modify any substantive right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2072
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/2071
When SCOTUS denied petitions for habeas corpus they are denying to order a response to the petition and the petitioner is being directed to file in a different court for habeas relief. 20.4. (b).
APPLICATIONS/PETITIONS
The first few petitions listed for habeas corpus have reached SCOTUS. They have already been to the lower court they were convicted in. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/2242
The court should have ordered the response. The court rules are inconsistent with federal law 28 U.S.C. 2243. (the word court refers to the district court)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/2243
The following SCOTUS cases have link to the docket.
1. Villarreal
(a) District of Southern Texas
2021-08-23
USA v Villarreal
5:21−cv−00096
030 Criminal Judgment 8/24/20
Villarreal v USA
5:21-cv-96
Marina Garcia Marmolejo
United States District Judge
001 Motion to Vacate 8/23/2021
002 Mem. of in support
005 ORDER 03/23/2022
006 FINAL JUDGEMENT 03/23/2022
(b) SCOTUS
In re Roberto Villarreal
21-7973
This case
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/21-7973.html
Conference June 16, 2022
Denied June 21, 2022
Rehearing June 26, 2022
Distributed July 28, 2022
Denied August 22 .2022
When I prepare a writ I have 5 numbered full pages. Getting other documents notarized the I notice something odd about the 5th page. There was extra pace. But it did not click.
Once the writ was docketed in SCOTUS, I saw the errors. No constitutional provisions and the date was incorrect. I do remember that twice a pop up appeared asking if I wanted to continue to share documents. I said no. WTF
But the most important part is the questioned presented
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
2. PINEDA
(a) U.S. District
Court,
District of Eastern Texas
2020-10-19
Pineda v U.S.A.; U.S.A. v Pineda
6:19cr39
Pinada v USA
6:20 cv 559
Jeremy D. Kernodle
U.S. District Judge
325 Pineda’s 2255 motion to vacate Filed 10/19/2020
001 2255 motion to vacate filed 10/19/20
005 Report and Reccomendation of Magistrate Judge 06/10/21
006 Pineda objection
007 Judges opinion and order.
008 Judgment Denied Certificate of Appealability. No constitutional right is denied by incarceration.
(b) SCOTUS
In Re In Pineda
21-5821
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/21-5821.html
Denied 11/01/2021
21-7410
.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/21-7410.html
Appendix not posted.? Posted in 21-5821
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
3. WAFER
(a) U.S. District Court, District of Oregon
U.S.A. v. Wafer
2020/12/15
Judge Robert E. Jones
17 cr 435
258 Habeas corpus § 2255 filed 12/15/2020
264 Government
response filed 02/04/21
Marijuana not a fundamental right
266 Wafer’s reply 03/08/21
267 Court order. Filed 03/26/21
269 COA Denied. 03/29/21
SCOTUS
In Re Wafer
21-334
Filing of Extra ordinary Writ of Habeas corpus 06/09/2021, conference 9/27/21 denied 10/4/21
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/21-334.html
Petition denied
21-715
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/21-715.html
Denied Rehearing
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
4. RAY
U.S. District Court,
District of Northern Texas
2020/4/20
U.S.A. v. Ray
19-cr-00010-O(5)
20-CV-049-O
Judge Reed O’Connor
267 Ray’s § 2255 motion filed 4/20/20.
7:20-cv- 49-O
005 Order to Amend 12/21/20
006 Amended Motion 2255 01/04/21
007 Order COA Denied 04/16/21
008 Final judgement. 04/16/21
SCOTUS
21-54
In Re Ray
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/21-54.html
Docket Number
21-54
Denied 10/4/21
OTHER 2255 Motions to Vacate
U.S. District Courts
All district court document can be access on PACER
https://pacer.login.uscourts.gov/csologin/login.jsf
Cases not closed.
U.S. District Court
District of Maryland
21/10/10
U.S.A. v. Wheeler
Criminal Case No. CCB-19-455
70 Criminal Judgment
Wheeler v U.S.A.
Civil No. CCB-21-cv-2691
Catherine C. Blake
United States District Judge
72 2255 Motion 10/10/2021
73 Order to respond. 12/3/21
79 Government response 2/18/22
80 Wheeler’s reply. 3/1//22
U.S. District Court
District of Maine
U.S.A. v. Richard Daniels
2:18-cr-63-GZS-001
1033 Criminal Judgement
Daniels v
U.S.A.
2:21-cv-312-GZS
Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison
Judge George Z. Singal
1071 2255 Motion 11/01/21
1077 Government Response 01/31/21
1083 Reply 01/25/21
1105 Magistrate judge Recommendation 04/08/22
Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison
file:///C:/Users/mjdee/Documents/2022%20SCOTUS/1st%20Danials%20Decided/1105%20daniels%20magistrate%20judge.pdf
1113 Opposition
1115 Denial of COA 05/19/22 Judge George Z. Singal
Closed CASES
U.S. District
Court
District of Southern Mississippi
2022/03/24
U.S.A. v Jones
1:21-cr-67 LG-RPM-001
Criminal Judgment 10/7/21
Jones v U.S.A.
1:22 CV 65-LG
LOUIS GUIROLA, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10 2255 Motion to Vacate 3/24/
11 Mem of Law
12 Court order 4/21/22
13 COA Denied 4/21/22
14 Reconsideration 5/5/22
15 Denied 5/9/22
U.S. District
Court
District of Western Louisiana
2020/05/11
U.S.A. v. Robinson
3;18-cr-228-1
Judge Terry A. Doughty
Mag. Judge Karen L. Hayes
34 Criminal Judgment
40 Robinson’s § 2255 Motion 5/11/2020
43 Court Order 5/13/ 2020
44 Court judgment 5/13/2021
45 Court Denies COA Denies Standing. Liberty not a right
U.S. District
Court
District of Southern Mississippi
2020/02/28
U.S.A. v. Davison
3:17-CR-149-DPJ-FKB
Davison v USA
3:20 cv 116
Daniel P. Jordan III
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
In Behalf § 2255. (e)
195 § 2255 motion in behalf. 2/28/2022
196 § 2255 Court order 3/3/2020
206 In behalf opposition to order 3//3/2020
207 Court order denial opposition to 196 3/3/2020
Davison’s Filing
201 Davison § 2255 motion
202 § 2255 Court order.3/18/2020
204 Court Denies COA 3/10/2020
U.S. District Court
District of Western Michigan
10/22/2020
U.S.A. v. Corbin closed
1:18-cr-166
Corbin v USA
20-cv-1010
Paul L. Maloney United States District Judge
316 2255 Motion to vacate Filed 10/22/2020
317 Memorandum of law
318 Order to Answer 10/23/2020 60 days to Respond
324 USA Motion to Dismiss 12/16/2020
330 Corbin’s Response 1/8/2021
334 Order Time Barred
U.S. District
Court
District of Virgin Island
U.S.A. v. Bully Closed
1:17-cr-00012-1
George W. Cannon, Jr. Magistrate Judge
147 2255 Motion to Vacate, Habeas Relief
164 OPPOSITION Dated: June 21, 2019
Gretchen C. F. Shappert United States Attorney,
/s/ Daniel H. Huston Assistant U.S. Attorney
168 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 07/22/2019
George W. Cannon, Jr. Magistrate Judge
171 Opposition to R. & R.
192 Bully’s 2255 motion ignored
U.S. District Court
District of Maine
2019/06/03
U.S.A. v Sawtelle
1:17-cr-00125-JDL-2
John C. Nivison, U.S. Magistrate
Judge
Chief Judge JON
D. LEVY
142 Sawtelle’s § 2255 motion filed 6/3/19
143 Order to respond 6/4/2019 60 days
144 USA Response p. 5-7. 7/29/2019
145 Reply 8/12/2019
147 Recommendation p. 6-7 12/17/2019 John C. Nivison, U.S. Magistrate Judge
148 Objection 12/30/2019
149 Order COA denied. 2/6/2020 Chief Judge JON D. LEVY
U.S. District
Court
District of Wyoming
2019-05-14
U.S.A. v. Doty Closed
I:18-CR-0102-SWS
18cr102
Judge Scott W. Skavdahl
44 Doty § 2255 motion I filed in behalf § 2255(e) 5/14/2021
45 Doty 2255 order Dismissed Marijuana not a fundamental right. 5/16/2019