A.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Gully v Warden Leavenworth.
Case 5:24-cv-03113-JWL Document 4 Filed 07/17/24
Document 4: Order of Dismissal.
Challenging the constitutionality of the marijuana that could overturn the conviction of sentence. Cites outdated case law.
17 July 2024 John W. Lungdtrum US District Judge
B.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION
GULLY v WARDEN, USP
COLEMAN.
Case No. 5:25-cv-23-JSS-PRL
ORDER Document 4 Filed 04/17/25
“This petition is due to be dismissed because the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.” Saving clause of 2255 motion to vacate
Case 5:25-cv-00023-JSS-PRL Document 4 Filed 04/17/25
DISMISSED CLOSE THIS CASE
ORDERED Olando Florida April 17, 2025
Julie S. Snead US District Judge
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANTHONY ROBERT TIRADO, Petitioner,
v.
TIMOTHY TAYLOR, Respondent.
1:24-cv-01069-KES-SAB Document 4
Recommendation of Majistrate Judge
“A petitioner may proceed under § 2241 pursuant to the escape hatch when the petitioner “(1) makes a claim of actual innocence, and (2) has not had an ‘unobstructed procedural shot’ at presenting that claim.”
Dated: 10/8.2024 United States Magistrate Judge. Stanley A. Boone SAB
US District Judge
1:24-cv-01069-KES-SAB Document 5 Filed 12/19/24
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE, AND DECLINING TO ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
2241 Treated as a 2255 motion to vacate.
December 19,.2024
US District Judge Kirk E. Sherrif
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
A.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA Wheeling
Case 5:24-cv-00203-JPB-JPM Document 4 Filed 10/22/24
RONALD FREEMAN, Petitioner, v. WARDEN HEATHER RAY, Respondent
ORDER`
Prisoners seeking to challenge the validity of their convictions or sentences are required to proceed under § 2255 in the district court of conviction. By contrast, a petition for writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to § 2241, is generally intended to address the execution of a sentence, rather than its validity, and is to be filed in the district where the prisoner is incarcerated. Fontanez v. O’Brien, 807 F.3d 84, 85(4th Cir. 201 5). Petitioner
10/22/2024 John Preston Bailey U.S. District Judge
B.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY NORTHERN DIVISION AT ASHLAND
CIVIL ACTION NO. 25-41-DLB
Freeman v. Warden FCI Ashland
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: . Freeman’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. # 1) is DENIED. This action is STRICKEN from the Court’s docket. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.
10 April 2025
David L. Bunning
Chief United States District Court