UnReasonable Seize Marijuana OUR RIGHTS THEIR BETRAYAL

JJ. GOLDEN, Justice

 [¶1] Appellant Michael J. Dee appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his declaratory judgment action. Dee presents no argument that the district court’s specific ruling was incorrect. The district court’s order is therefore summarily affirmed.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
STATE OF WYOMING, COUNTY OF LARAMIE
DOCKET NO. 169-897

FILED
JUNE  2 6, 2007
GERRIE E. BISHOP
CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT


MICHAEL J. DEE,                          ) 
                                                       )
Plaintiff                                           )
V.                                                    )
STATE OF WYOMING,                  )
                                                        )
Defendant                                       )



ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT


The Court notes that the claims asserted here were adjudicated in January, 2007, docket 169-223 between the plaintiff and the defendant. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss. For the reasons stated in the motion, the Court sua sponte ORDERS that the complaint is dismissed with prejudice.



DATED this 25 day of June, 2007.


EDWARD L. GRANT
DISTRICT JUDGE

=================================

STATE OF WYOMING           )                                                                                                                  IN THE DISTRICT COURT
                                                  ) ss.
COUNTY OF LARAMIE         )                                                                                                                 FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT



MICHAEL J. DEE,                                )
Plaintiff,                                                  )
                                                                )
vs.                                                           )                                          Doc. 0102 No. 169223
                                                                )
STATE OF WYOMING,                        )
Defendant.           

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


THE ABOVE-ENTITLED MATTER came before the Court for a summary judgment hearing on the 2nd day of May, 2007, the Plaintiff, Michael J. Dee, appearing Pro se and the Defendant, State of Wyoming, represented by Timothy J. Forwood. The Wyoming Supreme Court has held, "There is a strong presumption in favor of the constitutionality of a statute." Jones v. State. 2006 WY 40, H 8, 132 P.3d 162, 164 (Wyo. 2006). The Court, having read the pleadings, heard argument and being otherwise informed, finds as follows:


Plaintiff has not overcome the strong presumption of constitutionality.

Plaintiff has not presented this Court with a justiciable controversy.


IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is denied, and Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted.

Done this 7th day of May, 2007.


Hon. Edward L. Grant
District Court Judge 

=======================================