U.S. SUPREME COURT CASES
Decided October 6, 2008
It is a rule without law for judges to say the enforcement of criminal laws do not affect individual rights.
Two case regarding the reasonableness of the marijuana laws were on the U.S. Supreme Court Docket, 07-1534 and 07-1535.
On October 6, 2008 Supreme Court will not review the Decisions of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court and the Wyoming Supreme Court.
Questions Presented for Review
Did the enforcement of the marijuana laws of the State of Maine “affect” petitioner’s fundamental rights to liberty and property secured from unreasonable siezure by the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the United States Constitution?
Does the Fourth and Fifth Amendments permit the Maine Supreme Judicial Court to review the constitutionality of laws that criminalize the private growing and possession of marijuana by rational review?
Questions Presented for Review
Did the enforcement of the Wyoming marijuana laws, “affect” petitioner’s fundamental rights to liberty and property secured from unreasonable seizure by the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the United States Constitution?
Does the Fourth and Fifth Amendments permit the Wyoming Supreme Court to review the constitutionality of laws that criminalize the private growing and possession of marijuana by rational review?
=======================================
2008-10-10 My responce to US Supreme Court denying review of the Maine Supreme Judcial Court and the Wyoming Supreme Court decisions.
Federal Court House and Home of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court.
Portland, Maine
Federal Court House Home of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court.
The judges in these court declared the marijuana laws are rational regulation of my liberty and property.
Marijuana users are non persons because they are subjected to rational search and seizure of our person and liberty for violating the marijuana laws.
The Maine Constitution says “The Legislature … shall have full power to make and establish all reasonable laws and regulations.” (Me. Const. Art. IV, pt 3, § 1, last sentence) http://janus.state.me.us/legis/const/
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be search, and the persons or things to be seized.”
"No person shall be ..... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;"