(work in progress)
=======
Criminal Complaints for Deprivation of rights DOJ Mailed March 1, 2009, again June 14, 2010 and again August 31, 2010
======
The police enforce the marijuana laws and they know the laws are unreasonble because there is no victim of crime. They deprive people of their rights under the color of law, for political reasons. They violate a federal criminal statute Title18 USC 242. They violate their oath to the constitution.
New York City July, 2010
Told to leave.
N.Y. State Supreme Court, NY City
=================================
President's trip to Bar Harbor, Maine and Acadia National Park
July 2010
President going to dinner and the sign I had. I was surrounded by 5 secrect service agents. My bag was inspected by someone who said he wasn't from law enforcement.
President leaving Bar Harbour
I missed spelled violate. It took a woman by NY Central Park a few weeks later who ask me: what is violale? Felt stupid. Well the war on marijuana is wrong also.
Teenager asked “Why is marijuana illegal?”
Parent replied “Marijuana has no medicinal use.”
Teenager asked “How come marijuana has no medicinal use?”
Parent replied “Because marijuana is to dangerous to use.”
Teenager asked “More dangerous than alcohol?”
Parent replied. “No, alcohol is a poison.”
Teenager asked “Why is marijuana illegal?”
Parent replied. “Congress lied"
=========================================
The Attorney General of the United States has the Aurtority to remove a drug as a Controlled Substance when it does not meet the criteria establish by law.
=======================
The legal question to raise: why it is reasonable and necessary to criminalize marijuana. This right is also called due process of law.
Email the President http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/
Comments: 202-456-1111
E-mail to the Department of Justice, including the Attorney General, may be sent to AskDOJ@usdoj.gov Attorney General Public Comment Line - 202-353-1555 Attorney General, Eric H. Holder, Jr., 202- 514-2001
Ask them these questions. Or contact your Congress people, your State's Attorney General, your governor to ask them why.
1 Please explain why it is necessary and reasonable by providing a compelling state interest to criminalize the private cultivation and use of marijuana and deprive people of their rights to privacy, to liberty and to property secured by the 4th, 5th and 14th Amendments?
2 Where are the facts that show marijuana is not safe to use under medical supervision to be a controlled substance?
§ 812. Schedules of controlled substances
http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/csa/812.htm
By Definition, 21 U.S.C. -812(b)(1) (1988) Schedule I Controlled Substances include all drugs or substances which:(A) have a high potential for abuse,
(B) have no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, (C) have a lack of safety for use under medical supervision.
3 Please explain why the judiciary reviews these criminal laws, proscribing marijuana, by rational review when judicial review of criminal laws by rational review is deprivation of my rights under the color of law?
========================
Unnecessary Laws
Criminal Complaints for Deprivation of rights DOJ Mailed March 1, 2009
Other activities.
Why is marijuana Still illegal?
If you do not know why marijuana is illegal, what happened to due process of law?
Due process of law also means laws that affect individual fundamental rights must be reasonable, to be justified by a compelling state interest. Why is it that the lawyers and judges deny the enforcement of the marijuana laws do not affect individual fundamental rights to liberty, to property and to privacy?
Alaskans have had constituional protection since 1975 to privately grow and possess marijuana. Questions for the ACLU, NORML, lawyers, judges: What happened to the rest of the country? Why is the 4th Amendment frivolous?
"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty." Thomas Jefferson
Mission of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court
"To administer justice by providing a safe, accessible, efficient and impartial system that serves the public interest, protects individual rights, and instills respect for the law." http://www.courts.state.me.us/
Maine Declaratory Judgment Act
Title 14 M.R.S.A. §5954. Construction and validity of statutes http://janus.state.me.us/legis/statutes/14/title14sec5954.html
Any person interested under a deed, will, written contract or other writings constituting a contract, or whose rights, status or other legal relations are affected by a statute, municipal ordinance, contract or franchise may have determined any question of construction or validity arising under the instrument, statute, ordinance, contract or franchise and obtain a declaration of rights, status or other legal relations thereunder.
Legislative Power.
Constitution of the United States
Article I Section 8 paragraph 18: “To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, ….”
"The Legislature, with the exceptions hereinafter stated, shall have full power to make and establish all reasonable laws and regulations for the defense and benefit of the people of this State, not repugnant to this Constitution, nor to that of the United States."
http://janus.state.me.us/legis/const/
Judge Crowley Order 2007
"This court cannot change the marijuana laws, and explicitly finds that there currently is no basis for invalidating them because the legislature had a rational basis for enacting them, and they do not encroach upon any fundamental right."
Me. Const. Art. IV, pt 3, § 1Why is marijuana still illegal?
The courts do not recognize marijuana as property and marijuana users as persons because only property and persons are protected from unreasonable laws.
Under the color of law, government procecutors and judges willfully deprive individuals their rights to keep marijuana illegal. Law enforcement officials who willfully deprive rights under the color of law violates Title 18 U.S.C. 242, a criminal offence. They are able to do this because defence attorneys do not claim injury to individual rights to liberty and to property in motions to dismiss and claim the marijuana laws are unreasonble. We have been denied equal protection of the 4th and 5th Amendments. We are not persons and marijuana is not property because only persons and property are secure from unreasonable laws.
I have been denied, as well of millions others, due process of law, a fundamental right, to question the validity, the constitutionality of the marijuana laws. Because our defense attorneys are what stupid? cowards? or just part of the conspiracy to keep marijuana illegal?
With a criminal and civil convictions I have been denied standing in many civil action called Declaratory Judgment, I have ask the Maine courts, defenders of individual rights, for justification for criminalizing marijuana.
The courts in Maine,Wyoming and the U.S. District Court, District of Maine have denied that these civil and criminal laws have affected my individual rights to privacy, to liberty and to property secured from unreasonable searches and seizure, unreasonable deprivation by the 4th and 5th Amendments.
The courts have reviewed these criminal laws by rational review because the courts claim no rights are affected by the enforcement of these criminal laws. That is a lie. Getting arrested is seizure of person, deprivation of liberty. The court's decisions say my petitions for Declaratory Judgment are frivolous because marijuana is not a fundamental right.
2006-07-04
When the police enforce the marijuana laws they had deprived me and millions of others our rights under the color of law for political reasons. It is unreasonable to arrest someone who does not affect the rights of others. It is unreasonable to proscribe marijuana because this property by itself does not threatened the rights of others. Law enforcement oficials take an an oath to the Constitution and they violate it for political reasons.
May 1, 2008 July 3, 2006
The war on drugs is America's modern day unjustified civil war over property rights.
This war is sustained by the US judiciary by deprivation of rights under the color of law.
Supported by NORML Judicial reveiw of the marijuana laws, criminal laws, has been rational review because marijuana is not a fundamental right.
Frivolous law suits.
2009-10-05
Criminal laws do not affect individual rights to liberty and property.
2009-10-05
Classifying marijuana as a controlled substance.
2009-06-04 Bangor, ME 2006-01-22 Portland, ME
This web site will show why marijuana is still illegal.
Marijuana remains illegal because the judiciary, defender of individual rights, denies that these criminal laws affect individual rights to personal security, to personal liberty and private property protected by the 4th and 5th Amendments of the Constitution of the United States. And the members of the American judiciary say the drugs laws do not affect individual rights to life, liberty and property.
http://www.swatreform.org/index.shtml
ALASKA
FREE STATE
==============
"To preserve, protect, defend, the Constitution of the United States"
No change. Rule without law.
===================
Article I Section 8 paragraph 18: “To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.”
Constitution of the United States Article I Section 8 paragraph 18:
“To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers,"